Collaborative Design Practice: Task 1
Collaborative Design Practice/ Bachelor of Design (Hons) in Creative Media
Evaleez Voo Lian Yun / 0350275
Evaleez Voo Lian Yun / 0350275
Task 1
Instructions
MIB:
Project Brief:
Research
About Bamboo
Bamboo has emerged as a versatile and eco-friendly alternative resource for creating various household items such as cups, utensils, and more. This fast-growing plant offers a multitude of benefits that make it an attractive choice for both consumers and the planet. Some of its advanatages include:
- Renewable Resource: Bamboo is one of the fastest-growing plants on Earth. Unlike hardwood trees, , bamboo can be harvested in just a few years. This makes it a highly renewable and sustainable resource.
- Biodegradability: Bamboo products are biodegradable. This contrasts with plastic, which can take hundreds of years to break down and contributes to pollution.
- Strength and Durability: Bamboo is exceptionally strong and durable and can withstand daily use. They are less prone to chipping or breaking than traditional materials like plastic, ceramic or glass.
- Anti-Bacterial Properties: Bamboo contains natural antimicrobial agents that help reduce the growth of bacteria on its surface, making it a hygienic choice for kitchen items.
Target Audience
Demographics:
Age: Primarily millennials and Generation Z, but can also include environmentally conscious individuals from older age groups.
Gender: Equally appealing to both males and females.
Income: Diverse income levels, but generally middle to upper-middle-class individuals who can afford eco-friendly products.
Education: Higher education levels, as awareness of environmental issues often correlates with education.
Behaviour and Lifestyle:
Reusability Advocates: They are inclined to use reusable products such as water bottles, shopping bags, and straws as part of their daily routine.
Coffee and Tea Enthusiasts: Many in this audience are likely coffee or tea enthusiasts who frequently visit cafes or prepare their beverages at home.
Active Online Presence: They are engaged on social media platforms and online communities where they share and seek information about sustainable living, eco-friendly products, and zero-waste lifestyles.
Eco-Friendly Shopping Habits: They prioritise shopping at stores that align with their values, such as health food stores, local markets, and sustainable brands.
Purchasing Intent:
Willingness to Pay Premium: They are willing to invest in higher-quality and eco-friendly products, even if they come with a slightly higher price tag.
Repeat Purchasers: Once convinced of a product's sustainability and quality, they are likely to become loyal customers and make repeat purchases. This can also provide a chance for
Gift Buyers: They often buy eco-friendly products as gifts for friends and family members who share their values.
Process
Week 1
This week, we were given a brief on how the module is going to be conducted. Afterwards, we were all separated into groups to work on a project together till the end of semester. The project was a collaboration with Taylor's Business School, known as "GEM", which is short for Green Earth Movement.
To get to know the project better, we had another meeting with them that night. From here, we had most of our questions answered about the project. Link to meeting minutes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KrCUPwJgXN94Da0cR9ffEjWO8DWBTw9k/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103910261208820697970&rtpof=true&sd=true
![]() |
| Fig 1.0 280923 Meeting Reco |
Week 2
In Week 2, we were told to finalise our personas, empathy map and survey. After delegating the tasks between the members, Siew Ni and I started working on the buyer personas for this project. From my own experience with my friends, I chose to create a persona who is not in the best financial situation but still wants to live and eco-conscious life. Besides that, the other persona I made was of a middle aged man, who wants to use eco-friendly products but is wary of the safety of his childen.
With the finalisation of persona, I moved to creating the empathy map and started sharing our survey on my social media platforms. We also had a meeting with the team to finalise our project document. We also moved to discord to have more meeting time, since we don't hv Zoom premium :c.
We also had a short meeting with the business school to ask some questions on the project. Link to meeting minutes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ld06Jeh2wVW-u_UuLi2rOhak5vsYT07V/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103910261208820697970&rtpof=true&sd=true
![]() |
| Fig 1.1 050923 Meeting Recording |
![]() |
| Fig 1.2 Personas |
![]() |
| Fig 1.3 Empathy Map |
Week 3
This week, we are supposed to present to the business school on our research findings. From here, we started moving the information from our Google Docs to powerpoint slides instead. Besides that, we also worked together to finalise the project document, i.e what we will produce, constraints, indicators, challenge analysis and the target audience.
Link to Final Presentation: Slides:
Link to Project Document:
Week 4
This week we found out that the business school has finalised the designs they want for their product. It is quite confusing to us because at the start, they asked us to design the cups ourselves.
Feedback
Week 1
- Get your groups ready
- Remember to contact the business school students
- Start making the empathy map
Week 2
- RM30 for a cup is definitely too expensicve if the target audience is lower to middle income. Need to discuss with them about this.
- Let TBS know that we can only provide 3D models of the product instead of the actual item.
- Art direction is in Task 2 but so far still okay
Week 3
- The problem statement is weak and doesnt really state what you’re going to solve
- The data from the survey and your persona doesnt match
- You can redo the slides and research in another angle but it will only be used for future references and will not be marked again for this task.
Next Course of Action
Week 1
For the next course of action, we split the tasks between the members.
Art Direction: Cecil
Research & data (2 people): Vernice, Cheryl
Personas (2 people): Evaleez, Siew Ni
Survey (2 people): Britney, Jo Min
Website: Siew Ni, Britney
Product Design: Evaleez, Moey
Week 2
For the next course of action, all of us worked together to share the survey and finalise the project document and presentation slides.
Week 3
For the next course of action, we split the presentation slide speaker among the members:
Introduction & Research (1): Vernice
Survey Analysis (3): Britney, Jo Min, Cecil
Persona (1): SIew Ni
Empathy Map(1): Eva
Problem Statement & Ending (1): Cheryl
Submission
Research (Vernice & Cheryl):
Survey (Britney & Moey):
Presentation Slides:
Project Document (PPT):
Project Document (DOC):
Reflection
Experience
After listening the module brief from Ms Lilian, I realised this module is quite similar to what we did in Minor Project, whereby we had to essentially brand a product. So, in terms of experience I already had some experience on how to lead the team and finalise our tasks, especially for the project document.
Although I have worked with clients before I have never worked with students from the business school. It was quite an interesting journey because when I first heard their proposal I was quite flabbergasted by the price they want to charge their customers. Moreover, we could tell that their project idea was not fully solid yet, because there were some things that we pointed out, i.e. when Britney gave them suggestions on the customisation of the cups, they were like "woah, that is actually a really really good idea, thank you." Moreover, after our presentation on Week 3, they redid their proposal and only chose cups and tumblers as the final output, instead of the original cup and utensils idea.
Observation
In terms of observation, I can see how each group member tries their best to contribute to the project. Whether it be through research, giving ideas and communicating with one another, everyone is pulling their weight and I am honestly very grateful to have them in my team.
Moreover, I'm not sure if this is stepping out of line, but we were a bit sad that not all of the business students came to watch our presentation since we all agreed to the time together. I justt assume that they are busy with classes, so there's no hard feelings there.
Findings
I found that talking in the group chat instead of personal messaging the group leader of TBS is better. This way, everyone in the team will be updated at the same time, and it also reduces the risk of miscommunication between members.
Besides that, I feel like I should help Cecilia more on the Art Direction albeit not being in Graphic Design. We should not dump everything onto her.
-7130475.jpg)






Comments
Post a Comment